Clay Thompson vs David Rice Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W L L L
Form
L W L W W L L L L LH2H: Thompson 1 - 0 Rice
They have played 3 sets in total, with Thompson winning 2 and Rice winning 1. The last match between Thompson and Rice was at the Champaign Challenger, 16-11-2015, Q3, I.hard with Clay Thompson getting the victory 6-3 5-7 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Clay Thompson | 1 |
| David Rice | 0 |
Champaign Challenger(16-11-2015)
6
3
5
7
7
5
| Thompson | Stats | Rice |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 408 | Highest Rank | 283 |
| 32 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 7 |
| 58% (90-66) | Career Total W/L | 55% (290-239) |
| $920 | Career Prize Money | $12,000 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 5-7 7-5 |
Stats 
Clay Thompson
Player
David Rice
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:11:47 | Average Match Time | 2:11:47 |
| 59% (60/101) | 1st Serve % | 68% (71/104) |
| 62% (37/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (44/71) |
| 44% (18/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
| 73% (8/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 78% (7/9) |
| 45% (47/104) | Return Points Win % | 46% (46/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Clay Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Clay Thompson
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Clay Thompson
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Clay Thompson
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Ryoto Tachi
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
8
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Clay Thompson
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
John Lamble
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Clay Thompson
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
13
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Beck Pennington
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
11
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
David Rice Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
David Rice
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
David Rice
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
David Rice
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kirill Dmitriev
Player
David Rice
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
14
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
David Rice
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Farris Fathi Gosea
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Alexander A. Jesse
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
David Rice
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Maxime Tchoutakian
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
David Rice
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (90/66) | Win/Loss | 55% (290/239) |
| 57% (205/154) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (651/565) |
| 53% (1833/1628) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5714/5512) |
| 57% (72/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (140/90) |
| 57% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 29% (14/35) |
| 64% (14/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (98/79) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (38/35) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 638 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 384 | Total Double Faults | 345 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 537.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 559.05 |
| 59% (3523/5924) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4021/6208) |
| 73% (2567/3523) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2723/4021) |
| 50% (1204/2401) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1009/2187) |
| 42% (202/481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (267/629) |
| 36% (2114/5839) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2518/6417) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (27/24) | Challenger W/L | 52% (57/53) |
| 63% (62/37) | Futures W/L | 57% (232/177) |
| 57% (88/154) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (287/521) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (25/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (65/132) |
| 45% (21/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (92/166) |
| 86% (93/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (281/234) |
| 14% (93/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (281/46) |
| 14% (63/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (248/56) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
